The Ontological Drift of Learning: Presence, Authority, And Instrumental Reason in AI Platforms

Authors

  • Wang Yingying (UPSI/ Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris) Author
  • Mohd Ekram AI Hafis Bin Hashim (UPSI/ Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E2/2026-05

Keywords:

higher education, AI-mediated learning, platformised new media, ontological crisis, ethical crisis, phenomenology, critical theory

Abstract

This article presents a conceptually rigorous, argument-driven paper on the ontological and ethical crisis of higher education in the age of AI-mediated learning and platformized new media. Higher education is undergoing an ontological drift: learning is increasingly framed as optimization, efficiency, and measurable outputs, which subtly erodes (a) lived presence in learning, (b) the ethical relation between teacher–student, and (c) the authority of knowledge as a shared, cultivated horizon. Treating AI not as a neutral tool but as a socio-technical mediator that reorganizes attention, temporality, accountability, and what counts as “understanding.”

References

1) Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2

2) Biesta, G. J. J. (2010 ). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.

3) Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Charles Scribner's Sons. (Original work published 1923)

4) Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

5) Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.

6) Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.

7) Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.

8) Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). Crossroad. (Original work published 1960)

9) Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.

10) Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. Garland Publishing.

11) Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1944)

12) Ihde, D. (2010). Embodied technics. Automatic Press/VIP.

13) Introna, L. D. (2005). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. In S. D. Sharpley (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

14) Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

15) Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.

16) Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (K. Ross, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

17) Rosenberger, R. (2017). Notes on a nonfoundational phenomenology of technology. Foundations of Science, 22(4), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9480-5

18) Selwyn, N. (2019 ). Technology and education: Why it's crucial to be critical. In F. Rizvi & B. Lingard (Eds.), Globalizing education policy (pp. 215–230). Routledge.

19) Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

20) Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

21) U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Government Publishing Office.

22) Vial, S. (2018). Ontophany theory: Historical phenomenology of technology. Technè: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 22(2), 145–177.

23) Vieriu, A. M. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students' learning processes and academic performance. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

24) Wang, N., Wang, X., & Su, Y. S. (2024 ). Critical analysis of the technological affordances, challenges and future directions of generative AI in education: A systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305156

25) Zuboff, S. (2019 ). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Yingying , W., & Hashim, M. E. A. H. B. (2026). The Ontological Drift of Learning: Presence, Authority, And Instrumental Reason in AI Platforms. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(02), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E2/2026-05