Beyond Institutional Care: Why Lived Experience Should Inform Mental Health Professional Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-23Keywords:
lived experience, mental health education, deinstitutionalization, professional education, recovery, human rights, social work, nursingAbstract
The transition from institutional to community-based mental health care represents more than a change in the location of services; it requires a fundamental reconsideration of how mental health professionals understand care, autonomy, recovery, and expertise. Although contemporary professional education increasingly emphasizes person-centred and recovery-oriented approaches, people with lived experience often remain positioned primarily as recipients of care rather than contributors to professional knowledge. This Perspective argues that lived experience should occupy a meaningful role in the education of psychologists, social workers, nurses, and other mental health professionals. Narratives of institutionalization, recovery, stigma, coercion, community reintegration, and encounters with mental health services can illuminate dimensions of care that cannot be fully captured through textbooks, diagnostic frameworks, or professional guidelines. Meaningful involvement of people with lived experience may strengthen reflective practice, challenge stigmatizing assumptions, increase awareness of professional power and human rights, and support the development of more person-centred professional identities. However, such involvement must move beyond tokenistic participation and be grounded in ethical engagement, appropriate preparation, recognition of experiential expertise, and psychological safety. Integrating lived experience into mental health professional education should therefore be understood not merely as educational enrichment, but as an important component of contemporary, rights-based mental health training.
References
1. World Health Organization. Guidance on community mental health services: Promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
2. World Health Organization. World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
3. Happell B, O'Donovan A, Sharrock J, Warner T, Gordon S. Understanding the impact of expert by experience roles in mental health education. Nurse Educ Today. 2022; 111:105324. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105324.
4. Hawke LD, Sheikhan NY, Jones N, Slade M, Soklaridis S, Wells S, et al. Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: Critical reflections. Health Expect. 2022;25(5):2299-2305. doi:10.1111/hex.13586.
5. Parnell T, Fiske K, Stastny K, Sewell S, Nott M. Lived experience narratives in health professional education: Educators' perspectives of a co-designed, online mental health education resource. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:946. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04956-0.
6. Wainwright C, Harris N, O'Leary R, Riley T, Sofija E. The impact of mental health lived experience advocacy on youth education and employment engagement. Discov Ment Health. 2026;6:2. doi:10.1007/s44192-025-00339-7.
7. Childress C, Nayyar J, Gibson I. Tokenism and its long-term consequences: Evidence from the literary field. Am Sociol Rev. 2024;89(1):31-59. doi:10.1177/00031224231214288.
8. Stahl H, Metersky K. Beyond “peer worker”: Centering experiential expertise within interprofessional mental health teams. Nurs Health Sci. 2026. doi:10.1111/nhs.70374.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Georgia Konstantopoulou, Eirini Chytopoulou (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









