Male Scepticism, Female Advocacy: Gender Divergence in Family Planning Attitudes in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E8/2026-28Keywords:
family planning, gender perceptions, male scepticism, Social Cognitive Theory, sub-Saharan Africa, qualitative researchAbstract
Background : Kenya has made measurable progress in expanding modern contraceptive coverage and lowering fertility, yet unmet need for family planning (FP) persists unevenly across counties, and rural areas continue to report gendered gaps in contraceptive attitudes and use. This study examined how gender shapes perceptions of, and receptivity to, family planning among men and women of reproductive age in Tarakwa Ward, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.
Methods: A qualitative, phenomenological and cross-sectional design was used. Thirty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with community members aged 18–49 years, alongside key informant interviews with healthcare providers, using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted in Swahili or English, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analysed in NVivo 12 using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-step thematic analysis. Findings were interpreted through Bandura's (1986, 1989) Social Cognitive Theory.
Results: Attitudes toward FP diverged sharply by gender. Across 35 community-member interviews, 45.7% expressed active support for FP grounded in maternal health, birth spacing, and financial necessity; 14.3% explicitly framed FP as a “women's issue” from which men could reasonably remain distant; 20.0% expressed male scepticism linked to circulating myths about infertility, diminished virility, and infidelity; and 17.1% described stigma against unmarried FP users as a compounding barrier. Within these themes, individual accounts diverged sharply in content and register by gender: women consistently framed FP in terms of health and economic necessity, while men's accounts more often invoked misinformation, moral concern, or a perceived threat to marital authority. Healthcare providers corroborated these patterns, describing men as largely absent from FP counselling and outreach, and identifying male non-attendance itself as a driver of continued misinformation.
Conclusions: Gender divergence in FP attitudes in Tarakwa Ward reflects socially modelled and reciprocally reinforced roles, consistent with Social Cognitive Theory, rather than differences in knowledge alone. Closing this divergence requires deliberate, male-inclusive engagement strategies that address misinformation directly rather than programming that continues to treat women as the sole audience for FP communication.
References
1) Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
2) Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. JAI Press.
3) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4) Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Polity Press.
5) Britton, L. E., Tumlinson, K., Williams, C. R., Gorrindo, P., Onyango, D., & Wambua, D. (2021). How women and providers perceive male partner resistance to contraceptives in western Kenya: A qualitative study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 29, 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100650
6) Demissie, G. D., Akalu, Y., Gelagay, A. A., Alemnew, W., & Yeshaw, Y. (2022). Factors associated with decision-making power of women to use family planning among married women in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis of demographic health surveys. BMC Public Health, 22, 837. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13251-4
7) Hamm, M., Evans, M., Miller, E., Browne, M., Bell, D., & Borrero, S. (2019). “It's her body”: Low-income men's perceptions of limited reproductive agency. Contraception, 99(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.10.005
8) Kabagenyi, A., Reid, A., Ntozi, J., & Atuyambe, L. (2016). Socio-cultural inhibitors to use of modern contraceptive techniques in rural Uganda: A qualitative study. Pan African Medical Journal, 25, 78. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.78.6613
9) Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2019). 2019 Kenya population and housing census, volume I: Population by county and sub-county. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. https://www.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2019-Kenya-population-and-Housing-Census-Volume-1-Population-By-County-And-Sub-County.pdf
10) Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
11) Ministry of Health, Kenya. (2017). National family planning costed implementation plan 2017–2020. Government of Kenya. https://familyhealth.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/National-FP-Costed-Imlementation-Plan-2017-2020.pdf
12) Mosha, I., Ruben, R., & Kakoko, D. (2013). Family planning decisions, perceptions and gender dynamics among couples in Mwanza, Tanzania: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 13, 523. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-523
13) Newmann, S. J., Zakaras, J. M., Rocca, C. H., Gorrindo, P., Ndunyu, L., Gitome, S., Withers, M., Bukusi, E. A., & Dworkin, S. L. (2023). Transforming masculine norms to improve men's contraceptive acceptance: Results from a pilot intervention with men in western Kenya. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1), 2170084. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2170084
14) National Council for Population and Development. (2020). State of Kenya population 2020: Zero harmful practices. National Council for Population and Development. https://ncpd.go.ke/state-of-kenya-population-reports/
15) Ochako, R., Mbondo, M., Aloo, S., Kaimenyi, S., Thompson, R., Temmerman, M., & Kays, M. (2015). Barriers to modern contraceptive methods uptake among young women in Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 15, 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1483-1
16) Pajares, F. (2004). Albert Bandura: Biographical sketch. https://albertbandura.com/bandura-bio-pajares/t.html
17) Reyes, A. (2020). Gender-informed family planning perceptions and decision-making in rural Chiapas, Mexico: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1929143
18) Roudsari, R. L., Sharifi, F., & Goudarzi, F. (2023). Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health, 23, 818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15692-x
19) Sundararajan, R., Yoder, L. M., Kihunrwa, A., Aristide, C., Kalluvya, S. E., Mwakisole, A. H., & Downs, J. A. (2019). How gender and religion impact uptake of family planning: Results from a qualitative study in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Women's Health, 19, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0802-6
20) World Health Organization. (2025, July 3). Family planning/contraception methods. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception
21) World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Boniface Kipkemboi Kosgey, Joseph K. Rono, Paul C. Sutter (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
