Educational Innovations in Music and Physical Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Multidisciplinary Paradigm Shift in the 21st Century

Authors

  • Narong Wichairat Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand. Author
  • Sobsun mahaniyom Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand Author
  • Chatchai Amitpai Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand Author
  • Paisal Sukasame Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand Author
  • Subhaaddh Sattyathewa Independent Researcher and Scholar in Thailand Author
  • Piyapun Santaveesuk Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University, Thailand Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E1/2026-05

Keywords:

Educational innovation, music, physical education and sport, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), holistic well-being, sport technology.

Abstract

In the context of the 21st century, education systems worldwide are facing rapid digital transformation alongside growing public health challenges associated with sedentary lifestyles and declining physical activity among children and youth. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) therefore requires innovative, integrative approaches that meaningfully connect learning, health, and quality of life. This article aims to critically analyze and propose a multidisciplinary framework for integrating music and physical education/sport as a strategic mechanism for promoting holistic well-being and lifelong learning in alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 4 (Quality Education).
Drawing on a systematic review of interdisciplinary literature in neuroscience, educational psychology, sport science, and educational technology, the analysis demonstrates that the integration of rhythmic processing, auditory–motor coupling, and digital innovations—such as AI-driven interactive music applications—significantly enhances intrinsic motivation, motor efficiency, and learner engagement compared to traditional physical education models. Music-supported movement is shown to function not only as an affective stimulus but also as an external temporal scaffold that reduces cognitive load and facilitates effective motor learning.
The article further presents empirical and conceptual examples, including the application of Dalcroze Eurhythmics and mobile-based sport technologies, to illustrate how music–movement integration can foster learner-centered, inclusive, and sustainable learning experiences. Finally, strategic recommendations are offered for educational institutions and policymakers, emphasizing curriculum redesign, authentic assessment, and transdisciplinary teacher professional development to support the creation of resilient, technology-enhanced learning ecosystems. The study concludes that integrating music and sport within the ESD framework represents a transformative paradigm shift capable of advancing sustainable health behaviors and holistic human development in the digital age.

References

1) Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R., & BERA Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Special Interest Group. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817

2) Chen, J. L., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12),2844–2854.https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn042

3) Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

4) Jaques-Dalcroze, É. (1921). Rhythm, music and education. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

5) OECD. (2021). Bridging the digital divide for inclusive growth. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/589a2c1b-en

6) OECD. (2023). Teachers as designers of learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270287-en

7) Rauter, G., Sigrist, R., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2023). Wearable sensor-based systems for sport and health applications: A review. Sensors, 23(2), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020789

8) Repp, B. H., & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2

9) Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492590700

10) Stojadinović, A., Zdravković, D., & Zdravković, V. (2020). Physical education and music education in the context of the possibility of using the integrated learning approach as a reflection of modern society. Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport, 18(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPES200609060S

11) Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34305-5

12) Tan, Q., Yang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). Integrating music into physical education of learners with special needs: A comprehensive school-wide approach. Journal of Sports and Physical Education Studies, 4(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.32996/jspes.2024.4.2.1

13) Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Music and social bonding: “Self–other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1096.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01096

14) Terry, P. C., Karageorghis, C. I., Curran, M. L., Martin, O. V., & Parsons-Smith, R. L. (2020). Effects of music in exercise and sport: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000216

15) Thaut, M. H., McIntosh, G. C., & Rice, R. R. (1999). Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson’s disease patients. Movement Disorders, 14(1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199901000-00017

16) Thaut, M. H., McIntosh, G. C., & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic music therapy: Rhythmic

entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01185

17) UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO Publishing.https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448

18) Yerofeyeva, R., Batyashova, I., & Krivets, O. (2025). Integrating music mobile applications into students’ physical education classes. Trends in Physical Education and Sport, 1(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.31489/3081-0531/2025-1-1/5-11

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Wichairat, N., mahaniyom, S., Amitpai , C., Sukasame, P., Sattyathewa, S., & Santaveesuk, P. (2026). Educational Innovations in Music and Physical Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Multidisciplinary Paradigm Shift in the 21st Century. Journal of Social Science and Human Research Studies, 2(01), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E1/2026-05

Most read articles by the same author(s)