Motivated Strategies for Learning and Academic Performance of the Grade Vi Pupils in Sirawai Central School, Sirawai District, Schools Division of Zamboanga Del Norte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E7/2026-06Keywords:
motivated strategies for learning, academic performance, grade VI pupilsAbstract
This study aimed to determine the motivated strategies for learning and their influence on academic performance among the grade six students of the Sirawai Central School, Sirawai District, Schools Division of Zamboanga Del Norte, during the school year 2025-2026. It utilized survey and descriptive-correlational research methods. There were two hundred eighteen (218) grade six pupils who served as respondents. Weighted mean, standard deviation, and Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient (Spearman rho) were the statistical tests used with Microsoft Excel Data Analysis ToolPack and JAMOVI as the statistical software. The perceived level of motivated strategies for learning was high (AWV = 3.95). Extrinsic goal orientation ranked highest (AWV = 4.06), followed by task value (AWV = 4.00), control of learning beliefs (AWV = 3.94), self-efficacy (AWV = 3.90), and intrinsic goal orientation (AWV = 3.87). The level of academic performance was satisfactory (AWV = 2.88, equivalent to 80–84). No pupil received a failing grade. The largest group (44.95%) fall under Fairly Satisfactory (75–79), while only 5.50% achieved Outstanding (90–100). A positive, negligible correlation (rho = 0.054) was found, which was not significant (p = 0.429).
Based on the findings, the author recommends that the Department of Education–Zamboanga del Norte Division encourage teachers to integrate explicit instruction on self-regulated learning strategies, such as goal setting, time management, self-monitoring, and metacognitive reflection, into classroom activities. These strategies may help pupils effectively translate their high level of motivation into improved academic performance and more meaningful learning outcomes.
References
1) Abang, J. B. (2025). Driven to succeed: The interplay of student motivation, mentorship, and board exam performance in Northern Mindanao. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(10), 2381–2452. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000200
2) Alinsunurin, J. P. (2021). Unpacking underperformance: Learning mindsets and the challenge of academic achievement among Filipino students. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867956
3) Alipio, M. (2021). Predicting academic performance of college freshmen in the Philippines using psychological variables and expectancy-value beliefs to outcomes-based education: A path analysis. IMCC Journal of Science, 1(Special Issue), 77–86.
4) Almerino, P. M., Jr., Ocampo, L. A., Abellana, D. P. M., Almerino, J. G. F., Mamites, I. O., Pinili, L. C., Tenerife, J. J. L., Sitoy, R. E., Abelgas, L. J., & Peteros, E. D. (2020). Evaluating the academic performance of K–12 students in the Philippines: A standardized evaluation approach. Education Research International, 2020, Article 8877712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8877712
5) Aiken, L. S., & Susane, G. (2001). West multiple progression. Sage Publishing.
6) Artino, A. R., Jr., & Jones, K. D., II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
7) Bacongco, J. A., Deguma, M. C., Capuno, R. G., Canillo, A. B., Peñoza, G. I., & Deguma, J. J. (2026). Intelligence and non-cognitive traits as predictors of academic performance: Evidence from a Philippine state university. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 16(2),317. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2026-0297
8) Biboso, J., & Dela Cruz, C. J. B. (2025). Students’ motivation strategies and attitudes in learning social sciences: Basis for an action plan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 38(7), 776–799. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.380708
9) Cabilan, J. B., & Peteros, E. D. (2024). Predictive analysis of independent learning bearing on students’ mathematics performance in Davao de Oro, Philippines. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1409–1432. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1409-1432
10) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2014). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
11) Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
12) David, A. P., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Social axioms and domain-specific perceived academic control: A study of Filipino students. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 38(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2020.1834832
13) Dayalo, E., & Potato, E. (2024). Motivation: Does it make sense? Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13992367
14) Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015).
15) Department of Education. (2025). PISA 2022 national report: Creative thinking and academic performance in the Philippines. Department of Education–Planning `Service.
16) Eyas, M., Opingo, K. M., & Calasang, V. (2026). Parental involvement practices as predictors of learners’ academic performance and self-efficacy. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2026.8.1.1
17) Gan, Z., Liu, F., & Nang, H. (2023). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in students’ feedback engagement in English learning. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), Article 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050428
18) Gayrama, V. P. (2025). Motivation in self-regulated learning and technology-use efficacy among Filipino university students on an island: Indirect effects of perceived value, pressure, interest, and effort. Educational Process: International Journal, 15, Article e2025112. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.112
19) Gbollie, C., & Keamu, H. P. (2017). Student academic performance: The role of motivation, strategies, and perceived factors hindering Liberian junior and senior high school students’ learning. Education Research International, 2017, Article 1789084. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1789084
20) Ha, C., Roehrig, A. D., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in South Korean sixth graders: A two-level hierarchical linear modeling analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(4), Article e0284385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284385
21) Hariri, H., Karwan, D. H., Haenilah, E. Y., Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2021). Motivation and learning strategies: Student motivation affects student learning strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39
22) Honicke, T., Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2023). The self-efficacy and academic performance reciprocal relationship: The influence of task difficulty and baseline achievement on learner trajectory. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(8), 1936–1953. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197194
23) Khampirat, B. (2021). Validation of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: Comparison of three competing models. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14234a
24) Lahing, A. G. V., Ognase, F. W. P., & Maslang, K. L. (2024). Factors associated with the academic performance of Humanities and Social Sciences students in Philippine Politics and Governance subject. Research and Advances in Education, 3(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2024.08.01
25) Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2020). The relationships between self-efficacy, task value, and self-regulated learning strategies in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4389
26) Losenno, K. M., Muis, K. R., Munzar, B., Denton, C. A., & Perry, N. E. (2020). The dynamic roles of cognitive reappraisal and self-regulated learning during mathematics problem solving: A mixed methods investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101869. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101869
27) Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Fadhilah, N. (2025). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in Southeast Asian classrooms: A comparative analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(2), 234–251.
28) Mete, P. (2021). The mediating role of task value in relationship between self-efficacy and approach goals orientations in science. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.817409
29) Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2020). The role of control and motivation in students’ achievement and learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101827.
30) Nacua, S. L. D., Abcede, M. M. R., Nulo, S. L. H., Seraspe, D. C. A., Tabaosares, M. C., Namuag, C. M. O., Sabijon, J. V. M., Valiente, K. G. T., & Caracol, K. B. P. (2024). The impact of learning strategies on academic performance of junior high school students. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 7(6), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i6p107
31) Ondaro, J. E. V., & Dagoc, J. C., Jr. (2025). Students’ self-efficacy, epistemological beliefs and mathematics performance. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 4577–4589. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0329
32) Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
33) Rodríguez-Molina, M. F., Fernández-Casares, C., & González-González, H. (2021). Achievement goals and academic motivation: The role of external rewards in student engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 25(2), 131–143.
34) Refugio, C. N., Galleto, P. G., & Torres, R. (2019). Competence landscape of Grade 9 mathematics teachers: Basis for an enhancement program. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(2), 241–256. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v14i2.4125
35) Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
36) Tion, M. C. L., & Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2025). Social–emotional learning and motivation among Grade 4–6 learners in Philippine private schools: A descriptive–correlational study. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.29329/ated.2025.1388.1
37) Toroba, J. R. (2025). The mediating role of science motivation between the relationship of self-regulated learning strategies and students’ achievement in general science. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 126–141.
38) Usán, P., Salavera, C., & Teruel, P. (2019). School motivation, goal orientation and academic performance in secondary education students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 877–887. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S215641
39) Veneracion, E. (2023). Students’ motivation and learning strategies on academic performance in science in the new normal. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10171150
40) Wang, L. (2024). Survey research. In Z. Kan (Ed.), The ECPH encyclopedia of psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7874-4_53
41) Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Liew, J., & Kogut, A. (2023). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of self-regulated learning interventions on academic achievement in online and blended environments in K–12 and higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(16), 2911–2931. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2151935
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marjun D. Mortejo, MAEM, Apple P. Mortejo, MAEM, Leo C. Naparota, PhD (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
