The Theoretical Landscape of Environmental Aesthetics: From Appreciation to Obligation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E1/2026-06Keywords:
Environmental aesthetics, Aesthetic appreciation of nature, Environmental ethics, Cognitive vs. non-cognitive aesthetics, Sublime and picturesque.Abstract
Environmental aesthetics has emerged as a vital philosophical subfield investigating our aesthetic engagement with nature and the environment. This article traces the theoretical development of the discipline from its eighteenth-century roots through contemporary debates. It examines three central issues: the historical foundations of environmental aesthetics in concepts of the sublime, beautiful, and picturesque; the fundamental tension between cognitive approaches emphasizing scientific knowledge and non-cognitive approaches privileging emotional and imaginative experience; and the complex relationship between aesthetic value and environmental ethics. The article further explores recent developments including everyday aesthetics, the challenge of appreciating human-impacted environments, and the implications of climate change. By synthesizing these theoretical perspectives, the article demonstrates that environmental aesthetics is not merely abstract philosophy but a critical mode of inquiry with profound implications for understanding human-nature relationships and environmental responsibility in the Anthropocene.
References
1) Andrews, M. (1989). The search for the picturesque: Landscape aesthetics and tourism in Britain, 1760-1800. Stanford University Press.
2) Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press.
3) Brady, E. (2003). Aesthetics of the natural environment. Edinburgh University Press.
4) Brady, E., & Prior, J. (2020). Environmental aesthetics: A synthetic review. People and Nature, 2(2), 254–266.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10089
5) Budd, M. (2002 ). The aesthetic appreciation of nature. Oxford University Press.
6) Burke, E. (1998). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful (A. Phillips, Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1757).
7) Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press.
8) Carlson, A. (1979). Appreciation and the natural environment. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 37(3), 267–275.
https://doi.org/10.2307/430781
9) Carlson, A. (2000 ). Aesthetics and the environment: The appreciation of nature, art and architecture. Routledge.
10) Carlson, A. (2009). Nature and landscape: An introduction to environmental aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
11) Gilpin, W. (1792). Three essays: On picturesque beauty; on picturesque travel; and on sketching landscape. R. Blamire.
12) Hutcheson, F. (2004). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue in two treatises (W. Leidhold, Ed.). Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1725).
13) Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1790).
14) Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.
15) Parsons, G. (2008). Aesthetics and nature. Continuum.
16) Parsons, G., & Carlson, A. (2024). Environmental aesthetics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/environmental-aesthetics/
17) Saito, Y. (2007 ). Everyday aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
18) Shapshay, S. (2018). Environmental aesthetics, ethics, and ecoaesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 76(4), 399–402.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12586
19) Thompson, J. (1995 ). Aesthetics and the value of nature. Environmental Ethics, 17(3), 291–305.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 YinJi, UPSI, Ts. Dr. Muhammad Zaffwan bin Idris (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









