From Self-Regulated Learning to Self-Directed Learning: A Developmental Shift Toward Learner Competence in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jsshrs/V2E1/2026-11Keywords:
Self-Regulated Learning – SRL, Self-Directed Learning – SDL, Lifelong Learning Competency, Digital Age, Competency DevelopmentAbstract
In the context of digital transformation and the development of intelligent learning ecosystems, the role of learners is shifting from passive knowledge acquisition to active knowledge construction and the shaping of their personal learning paths. Although self-regulated learning (SRL) and self-directed learning (SDL) are both considered foundations of lifelong learning, the relationship between these two concepts remains unclear in educational practice. This paper analyzes the dialectical relationship between SRL and SDL to propose a theoretical framework for the shift towards developing learners' competencies. Through a synthesis of existing theoretical approaches, the study clarifies the functional hierarchy between the two concepts: SRL is seen as a process-level construct that supports learners in controlling the performance of specific learning tasks; Meanwhile, SDL is approached as a competency-level construct, linked to the level of autonomy, decision-making ability, and long-term learning strategy planning. Analysis shows that, in the digital age, these two concepts exist in a complementary and unified relationship, emphasizing the role of self-learning ability as a crucial factor not only for learning effectiveness but also for the sustainable adaptability of learners.
References
1) Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational psychologist, 45(4), 210-223.
2) Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
3) Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International journal of educational research, 31(6), 445-457.
4) Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
5) Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.
6) Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
7) Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International journal of technology enhanced learning, 4(5-6), 304-317.
8) Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.
9) Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult education quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
10) Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
11) Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2017). Awareness is not enough: Pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 82-96). Springer, Cham.
12) Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Association Press.
13) Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The internet and higher education, 29, 40-48.
14) Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review, 20(4), 411-427.
15) Long, H. B. (2000). Understanding self-direction in learning. In H. B. Long & Associates
16) (Eds.), Practice and theory in self-directed learning (pp. 11–24). Schaumburg, IL: Motorola University Press
17) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030. A Series of Concept Notes.
18) Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 422.
19) Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
20) Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
21) Winne, P. H. (2017). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. Handbook of learning analytics, 754, 241-249.
22) Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
23) Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373.
24) Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic press.
25) Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Minh Giam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
